A call for change

Text Box: PENNSYLVANIA

A Call For change:

Toward A RECOVERY-ORIENTED

Mental Health Service SYSTEM

for Adults

 

A Publication

Of The

PENNSYLVANIA

Office of Mental health

AND Substance Abuse Services

 

 

Text Box: Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare Office of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services 502 H&W Building PO Box 2675 Harrisburg, PA 17105 ˜™ Joan Erney, J.D. Deputy Secretary Office of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

 

 

Recovery Workgroup Members

 

Kim Anglin, Linda Bakmaz, Shelley Bishop, Thomasina Bouknight, William Boyer, Mary Lyn Cadman, Michael Chambers, Timothy Connors, Michele Denk, Mary Jo Dickson, Virginia Dikeman, Kate Donegan, Suzanne Elhajj, John Farmer, Cheryl Floyd, Hickman Gardner, Jeff Geibel, Scott Heller, Shirley Hopper-Schaech, Jim Jordan, Diane Keefer, George Kimes, Mary Kohut, Glenn Koons, Gayle Lorenz, Wendy Luckenbill, Robert Manrodt, Jim McCormack, Edna McCutcheon, Karen Morton, Nancy Porter, Robert Primrose, Suzanne Ralph, Mary Ellen Rehrman, Joseph Rogers, Jean Rush, Mary Jeanne Serafin, Lewis Silverman, Betty Simmonds, Caroline Smith, Kenneth Thompson, Sue Walther, Carol Ward-Colasante, Rae Weber, Danny Wildasin, Wendy Wood, Dave Wooledge, Linda Zelch

 

Recovery Steering Group Members

 

Linda Bakmaz, Shelley Bishop, William Boyer, Mary Lyn Cadman, Michelle Denk, Cheryl Floyd, Jeff Geibel, Scott Heller, Diane Keefer, Mary Kohut,  Jim McCormack, Betty Simmonds, Caroline Smith, Kenneth Thompson, Linda Zelch

 

Drexel University College of Medicine/Behavioral Healthcare Education

 

Taylor Anderson, Donna McNelis, Brenda Weaver

 

Consultant

 

Laurie Curtis

 

A Message from Joan Erney

It is with great optimism that I present A Call for Change:  Toward a Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Service System for Adults.  As I traveled around the state recently participating in the Service Area Planning meetings, it became clear to me that we are in the midst of an exciting awakening of hope, realization, and change.  The meaningful stories, the emerging leadership, and the compelling impact that a strong consumer voice is having across this Commonwealth is already in evidence.   This document is meant to serve as a further tool to move us toward our statewide vision that assures that every person will have an opportunity for growth and recovery.

 

I wish to thank the many individuals who stimulated our thinking and committed to the hard work of developing this document, especially the work of the OMHSAS Advisory Committee Recovery Workgroup.  A Call for Change clearly represents and honors the voice of individuals who are experiencing recovery and their undying advocacy to establish the realization nationally and in Pennsylvania that recovery from mental illness happens!  Recovery is the goal! 

 

A Call for Change establishes a firm foundation for the Pennsylvania transformation to a recovery-oriented mental health system.  It offers an understanding of how we’ve arrived at this time of recovery transformation, provides a concise definition of recovery, and further consideration of what a recovery-oriented system is and is not.  Indicators are provided to serve as critical reference points for services, agencies and county mental health programs looking for more specific strategies for transforming to more recovery-oriented services.  A Call for Change highlights the challenges we have yet to address and the need for us to engage in open, honest discussion and debate about these issues. 

 

Most importantly, we are called to take the steps and risks associated with true transformation.  As noted by William A. Anthony, PhD., “Massive system changes must occur if the vision of recovery is to become a reality for an ever-increasing number of people with severe mental illnesses.  For this very different vision to become reality, brilliant leadership is required.”  A Call for Change recognizes and calls upon the brilliant leadership of all who are part of our system – consumers, family members, advocates, providers, policy-makers and administrators – to effect true transformation in Pennsylvania.

 

OMHSAS is dedicated to building on the foundation of A Call for Change, so that the opportunity of recovery is fully supported for all who are served in our public mental health system.  We look forward to your dedication in working with us to achieve this goal.

 


Table of Contents

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.. ii

A Message from Joan Erney.. ii

Table of Contents.. ii

Why a Call for Change?. 2

Introduction.. 2

Envisioning a Transformed System in Pennsylvania.. 2

Role of the OMHSAS Advisory Committee and the Recovery Workgroup. 2

Scope and Role of A Call For Change.. 2

The Roots of Recovery in Mental Health.. 2

Deep Roots and a Legacy of Reform... 2

Views of Recovery.. 2

Research & Longitudinal Studies. 2

Civil Rights. 2

Pennsylvania Consumer/Survivor/Expatient Movement.. 2

Community Support Programs (CSP) 2

Addictions, 12-Steps, and Mutual Support.. 2

Growing Recognition and Interest in Mental Health Recovery.. 2

On the National Scene. 2

What Does Recovery Look Like?. 2

More than Treatment or Services. 2

Individual. 2

Programs/Services. 2

System... 2

Resiliency.. 2

But, We Already Do All That! 2

Indicators of a Recovery-Oriented Service System... 2

Recovery Is Not a New “Model”. 2

Basic Domains. 2

Indicators of Recovery Oriented Systems. 2

Implications of Shifting Toward a Recovery-Oriented Mental Healthcare System... 2

Challenges and Barriers. 2

Addressing Challenges and Barriers. 2

Toward Transformation.. 2

Only a Beginning.. 2

Your Call to Change. 2

Conclusion.. 2



Text Box: 1Why a Call for Change?

 

The goal of a transformed system:  Recovery[1]

“Tangata Whai Ora”: A term chosen by and used for people with experience of mental illness or distress in New Zealand.  Translated it means “people seeking wellness”.[2] 

˜

Introduction

We have all seen them – those pictures of people confined to locked wards of rambling old hospitals, the hopeless look in their eyes, abandoned by family and friends, and facing a future that is bleak and desolate.  It doesn’t matter how old those pictures are, the 1880’s, the 1940’s, the 1970’s, the eyes are still the same.  At different times, there have been waves of reform to improve conditions, to institute more effective treatments, to seek new ways to promote and support healing from psychiatric disorders.  We have found new, more helpful medications; we have helped people move from institutions to settings in our communities; we have found ways to help people find jobs or go back to school.  We believe we have had some success in this work. And, to some degree we have. But too often, the eyes are still the same. People are still disconnected from family and friends, isolated within their communities, and often trapped in assumptions about bleak futures due to chronicity and disability.

 

During the past decade, many voices have risen to challenge some of the basic assumptions about mental illness and its impact on the lives of individuals and their families.  People with serious mental illnesses do, in fact, recover. Some become fully symptom-free with time, while others live rich and fulfilling lives while still experiencing some psychiatric problems.  The amalgamation of these voices has created what is now known as the “recovery movement” in mental health. One of the basic premises of this movement is that the role of a mental health service system is not to “do for” or to “do to”, but to “do with” – recognizing a fundamental shift in roles, power, and responsibility for providers and consumers alike.  It is not about units of care, placement, or “functioning” or even a cure per se; it is about building real lives. It is both a goal or destination and a continual, very human process of growth, change, and healing.

 

The recovery movement is impacting the mental health system at all levels by challenging mental health providers, administrators, policy-makers, funders, workers, as well as people who experience mental health problems and their families to look at how negative or limiting assumptions are driving approaches to services, to funding, to treatment, to policies, and ultimately to the course of  individual lives.  The federal government has issued a call for sweeping transformation of the mental health service system throughout the United States. In Pennsylvania, this document, A Call for Change: Toward a Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Service System, carries this same mandate for change into the Commonwealth, building upon our current efforts, and providing a foundation for further reflection, discussion, planning and ultimately our transformation to a more recovery-oriented mental health service system for adults in this State.

 

Drawing from the experiences and ideas of Pennsylvanians, as well as contemporary literature and the experience of other states in tackling these changes, A Call for Change presents what is currently known about the elements of a recovery-oriented mental health system and presents a set of indicators by which the process and outcomes of transformation may be evaluated. OMSHAS expects that this document will help to articulate a more detailed vision of what a recovery-oriented system will look like in Pennsylvania at the state and local levels, and introduces the Call to Action for more strategically defining the necessary steps of transformation. 

 

In November, 2004 the Pennsylvania Recovery Workgroup generated this definition of recovery to guide service system transformation in this State.  It was fully endorsed by the Pennsylvania Office of Mental Health Substance Abuse Services (OMHSAS) in 2005.

Recovery is a self-determined and holistic journey that people undertake to heal and grow.  Recovery is facilitated by relationships and environments that provide hope, empowerment, choices and opportunities that promote people reaching their full potential as individuals and community members.

Operationalizing this definition of recovery throughout the Pennsylvania public mental health service system for adults is the prime goal and vision of this document.

 

Envisioning a Transformed System in Pennsylvania

OMHSAS Vision & Guiding Principles

 

Text Box: OMHSAS Vision Every individual served by the Mental Health and Substance Abuse Service system will have the opportunity for growth, recovery and inclusion in their community, have access to culturally competent services and supports of their choice, and enjoy a quality of life that includes family and friends.In 1995 Deputy Secretary Charles Curie developed the first OMHSAS mission statement that included an expectation that every person served within the system will have the opportunity for recovery.  In 2003 under the leadership of Deputy Secretary Joan Erney, the OMHSAS, with input from representatives of all major stakeholder groups, developed a recovery-focused vision statement of a transformed service system in Pennsylvania.

 

To support this vision, OMHSAS also identified a core set of guiding principles that outline primary tenets to be reflected in all change initiatives.  These guiding principles are as follows.

Guiding Principles

The Mental Health and Substance Abuse Service System will provide quality services and supports that:

·    Facilitate recovery for adults and resiliency for children;

·    Are responsive to individuals’ unique strengths and needs throughout their lives;

·    Focus on prevention and early intervention;

·    Recognize, respect and accommodate differences as they relate to culture/ ethnicity/race, religion, gender identity and sexual orientation;

·    Ensure individual human rights and eliminate discrimination and stigma;

·    Are provided in a comprehensive array by unifying programs and funding that build on natural and community supports unique to each individual and family;

·    Are developed, monitored and evaluated in partnership with consumers, families and advocates;

·    Represent collaboration with other agencies and service systems.

Role of the OMHSAS Advisory Committee and the Recovery Workgroup

In May 2004, OMHSAS redesigned its Advisory Committee Structure to be more inclusive and more responsive to the various stakeholder groups. This re-organized structure took on the responsibilities of the previous Mental Health Planning Council, and further identified its role to provi